A cláusula do devido processo legal e a inelegibilidade no processo de prestação de contas

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the constitutionality of the procedural and substantive aspects of ineligibility related to the process of accountability by the Chief Executive established the Supplementary Law No. 64/90, in its Article 1, Item I, Alínea "g". Indeed, many discussions have been fought over this issue, by virtue of the subjective aspects presented in the writing of this piece of legislation. So it is that apparently no single rule establishes ineligibility for all providers of account, which is not justified in light of constitutional principles. On the other hand, requires the configuration of an incurable irregularity, and no appeal of a competent body, without offering further details requiring an interpretation as the Constitution. Similarly, away, even temporarily, the general rule of ineligibility through the bringing of a judicial order to dismantle the decision rendered by the authority without clear limits here relate to the question can be determined by the judiciary. On this stormy issue, many questions also hang on the constitutionality of summary No. 1, issued by the Superior Electoral Court, and of the positions adopted by that Court, requiring at least one manifestation judicial authorization to remove the ineligibility. Within this context, with this dissertation aims to investigate the compatibility of these requirements with basic constitutional principles like the rule of law, Representative Democracy, Separation of Powers Clause and the Due Process of Law